Open data · CC-BY 4.0

Seattle, WA cost segregation benchmarks (2026)

Engine-derived ROI data from 5 representative Seattle-area properties. Methodology transparent below. CC-BY 4.0, journalists, CPAs, and researchers may cite this dataset with attribution.

Three key findings for Seattle

  1. Median engine-estimated Year-1 federal savings: $31,514 (interquartile range $27,828–$33,808, full range $23,477–$35,003) across 5 representative fixtures with purchase prices $685,000–$1,185,000. Assumptions: 100% bonus depreciation under OBBBA; 37% federal top marginal bracket. Individual property results vary substantially based on specific condition, renovation history, and rental treatment.
  2. Median reclassification ratio: 16.2% (interquartile range 15.8%–16.3%, full range 11.4%–19.5%). Furnished STRs sit higher in the range due to FF&E density; long-term rentals sit lower; renovation-cost-pool-driven properties span both. Your specific property may fall outside this range either direction depending on actual condition and renovation history.
  3. Median land allocation: 39.4% (interquartile range 39.4%–40.1%, full range 29.1%–53.1%). Resort-tier and high-cost-of-land neighborhoods (where the engine's premium land floor often applies) compress depreciable basis as a percentage of purchase price, but produce larger absolute dollar deductions. See the methodology note below the neighborhood table for the premium-floor mechanism.

Important framing: These are engine outputs for representative fixture scenarios, not predictions about any specific property. The cost segregation engine takes real property data (address, year built, square footage, renovation history, assessor records) and produces a study tailored to your actual property. The aggregate numbers shown here describe the Seattle market's general profile; your specific results will reflect your specific property.

Per-fixture results

Each fixture was run through the Cost Seg Smart engine, the same engine that produces real customer studies. Numbers below are reproducible from cities/seattle.json via scripts/run_city_stats.py.

Property Neighborhood Price Basis Land % 5-yr 15-yr Reclass % Y1 fed savings @ 37%
Capitol Hill Craftsman Flip
SFR · Built 1918
Capitol Hill / Central District $925,000 $560,550 39.4% $50,443 $40,930 16.3% $33,808
Ballard SFR + Detached ADU
SFR · Built 1940
Ballard / Fremont (Northwest Seattle) $875,000 $524,388 40.1% $50,775 $34,397 16.2% $31,514
West Seattle SFR Rental
SFR · Built 1962
West Seattle $785,000 $475,710 39.4% $43,062 $32,149 15.8% $27,828
Bellevue Eastside Condo
CONDO · Built 2014
Bellevue / Kirkland (Eastside) $1,185,000 $556,116 53.1% $58,241 $5,212 11.4% $23,477
Renton Suburban Fourplex
FOURPLEX · Built 1985
Renton / Kent (suburban King County south) $685,000 $485,734 29.1% $64,068 $30,536 19.5% $35,003

Reclassification by property type

Engine property typeFixturesMedian reclass %MinMax
SFR 3 16.2% 15.8% 16.3%
CONDO 1 11.4% 11.4% 11.4%
FOURPLEX 1 19.5% 19.5% 19.5%

"STR" denotes residential property operating as a short-term rental, the engine applies an FF&E density uplift not captured in the LTR (long-term rental) treatment.

Typical land allocation by neighborhood

NeighborhoodTypical valueTypical land allocationProfile note
Capitol Hill / Central District $925,000 ~32% Dense urban residential with 1910s–1920s Craftsman stock and post-2010 townhome new builds. Higher land allocation. Fix-and-flip and small-MF activity.
Ballard / Fremont (Northwest Seattle) $875,000 ~28% 1920s–1950s SFR with heavy post-2010 renovation. ADU expansion since 2019 zoning reform. Mid-tier land allocation.
West Seattle $785,000 ~26% SFR-dominant residential west of downtown. Lower land allocation than Capitol Hill. Mix of fix-and-flip and ADU expansion.
Bellevue / Kirkland (Eastside) $1,185,000 ~30% Tech-employer-anchored Eastside residential. Higher absolute basis. Mid-rise condo and SFR mix. Stronger corporate-relocation LTR demand.
Renton / Kent (suburban King County south) $525,000 ~20% Lower-cost SFR rental market south of Seattle. Lower land allocation. Strong BRRRR and build-to-rent activity. Lighter STR regulation than Seattle proper.
Why per-fixture engine output may differ from the typical land allocation:

The "typical land allocation" column reflects baseline patterns for each sub-market based on county assessor records and statistical modeling. For specific properties where reconstruction cost (RSMeans 2024 component build-up adjusted for time and geography) exceeds 2.0× the implied depreciable basis after subtracting the baseline land, the engine applies a premium land floor (~50%) to keep the study within audit-defensible territory. This typically affects ultra-premium resort inventory (ski-in/ski-out, beachfront, view-premium properties), where land scarcity premium dominates the purchase price. The per-fixture table above shows the actual land_source used by the engine for each fixture, values of statistical_premium_floor indicate the premium-floor mechanism was applied.

The takeaway: typical neighborhood allocations describe the market baseline. Individual property results depend on specific reconstruction-cost-vs-purchase-price ratios, and ultra-premium product may show higher land allocation in the engine output than the neighborhood typical.

Washington tax context

Washington state position on §168(k) bonus depreciation:

Washington has no state individual income tax, federal §168(k) bonus depreciation is the entire income-tax story for Seattle investors. But the WA tax landscape has two distinct features: a 7% capital gains tax on long-term gains above $250K (rental real estate generally exempt from this specific tax), and the B&O excise tax on rental business gross receipts (varies by rental classification). Neither affects the cost-seg study itself, engine output is unchanged, but both should factor into multi-year operating-economics modeling around the Year-1 cost-seg deduction.

Decoupling: Verify B&O tax treatment of your specific rental activity with your CPA, WA B&O classification rules vary by property type and lease structure.

State income tax structure: No individual income tax. 7% Washington capital gains tax applies on long-term capital gains above $250K threshold (rental property gains exempt from this specific tax). Business & Occupation (B&O) tax applies to gross rental receipts at varying rates.

Verify with your CPA. State tax conformity for federal §168(k) is adjusted frequently. Framing reflects our understanding as of May 2026, verify current-year treatment with a qualified tax professional.

Methodology

Every figure on this page is reproducible. The pipeline:

  1. Fixture definition. 5 Seattle-area properties defined in cities/seattle.json under the engine_fixtures array, each with address, property type, purchase price, year built, square footage, and STR/LTR flag.
  2. Engine run. The script scripts/run_city_stats.py instantiates a PropertyInput for each fixture and calls engine.run_study(), the same path that produces a real customer study.
  3. Base costs. RSMeans 2024 construction-cost data by component category, applied as base-rate per square foot.
  4. Time index. BLS Producer Price Index (Construction Materials series WPUFD49207) adjusts RSMeans 2024 dollars to acquisition-date dollars.
  5. Geographic factor. Six-tier resolver: pinned metros → calibrated → manual → state → region → national default.
  6. Land allocation. County assessor records when reliability gate passes; statistical fallback (metro → state → national medians) otherwise. Premium floor applies when reconciliation factor (rf_raw) exceeds 2.0.
  7. MACRS classification. IRS Pub. 946 + Rev. Proc. 87-56 asset class lives, 5-year (personal property), 7-year (office equipment), 15-year (land improvements), 27.5-year (residential structure), 39-year (commercial structure).
  8. Bonus depreciation. 100%, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA, signed July 2025) permanently restored 100% bonus for property placed in service in 2025 and later.
  9. Federal tax savings illustration. Computed at the 37% top marginal bracket. Actual savings vary by taxpayer; consult your CPA.

For full methodology details including QC validation, reconciliation logic, and audit-defense documentation, see costsegsmart.com/methodology.

Citation

This dataset is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may republish, remix, or extend this data for any purpose with attribution. Suggested citation format:

Cost Seg Smart Research Team. (2026). "Seattle, WA Cost Segregation Benchmarks 2026." Cost Seg Smart. 5 representative fixtures.
Retrieved from https://seattlecostseg.com/data/seattle-cost-seg-stats/

For interview requests, additional data slices, or related questions: [email protected].

Related resources